Thank you haelcer
jean-luc picard
JoinedPosts by jean-luc picard
-
1
Armageddon in 1975 - book
by Haelcer in"armageddon in 1975 - 'probability' or 'possibility".. .
book of polish author w. bednarski in pdf.. this book holds a large collection of quotations from watchtower publications on 1975.. download here:.
http://www.4shared.com/document/n5a3k3qw/armageddon_in_1975.html.
-
-
18
Confused about something....
by faundy innot posted on here in a while.... .
my sister is the only one in our family who's still a witness.
she's 32 and married to a servant.
-
jean-luc picard
Hi faundy.
There are lots of maybes:
maybe your sister just has a problem with the fact that you are lesbian
-
14
How would you respond to this JW apologist II - THE SEQUEL
by Black Man inas you know, i'm embroiled in a family and internet debate/dialogue w/jws the last few days.
and you all have been helping get great points in.
the text that i'm about to post come from a jw apologist who has acknowledge some of my comments about jws being a cult and that no tolerance for questioning them is one of the signs of a cult.
-
jean-luc picard
See CRISIS OF CONSCIENCE pages 4 and 5.
Three different men
Three different religions
All three disagreed with some aspect of their religion
Three different reactions to this by the religious leaders
Guess which religion acted the harshest
-
-
jean-luc picard
Good question designs.
The answer is Her would not.
Jdubs have to go into a long drawn out arguement to try and justify their idea.
-
22
I am thinking about voting
by Bucholz inso, i am thinking about voting for the first time in my life.
even though there is a questions from readers article that basically mentioned it is a conscience matter, we all know what the unwritten rule is.. problem is, even though i'm mentally out, i'm still physically in.
do you think that if i'm seen at the polling station by the witnesses i could suffer any consequences?
-
jean-luc picard
Wouldnt it be funny if you found the po there
-
21
Are most JW families dysfunctional?
by 21stcenturywoman in[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:worddocument> <w:view>normal</w:view> <w:zoom>0</w:zoom> <w:trackmoves /> <w:trackformatting /> <w:punctuationkerning /> <w:validateagainstschemas /> <w:saveifxmlinvalid>false</w:saveifxmlinvalid> <w:ignoremixedcontent>false</w:ignoremixedcontent> <w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext>false</w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext> <w:donotpromoteqf /> <w:lidthemeother>en-us</w:lidthemeother> <w:lidthemeasian>x-none</w:lidthemeasian> <w:lidthemecomplexscript>x-none</w:lidthemecomplexscript> <w:compatibility> <w:breakwrappedtables /> <w:snaptogridincell /> <w:wraptextwithpunct /> <w:useasianbreakrules /> <w:dontgrowautofit /> <w:splitpgbreakandparamark /> <w:dontvertaligncellwithsp /> <w:dontbreakconstrainedforcedtables /> <w:dontvertalignintxbx /> <w:word11kerningpairs /> <w:cachedcolbalance /> </w:compatibility> <w:browserlevel>microsoftinternetexplorer4</w:browserlevel> <m:mathpr> <m:mathfont m:val="cambria math" /> <m:brkbin m:val="before" /> <m:brkbinsub m:val="--" /> <m:smallfrac m:val="off" /> <m:dispdef /> <m:lmargin m:val="0" /> <m:rmargin m:val="0" /> <m:defjc m:val="centergroup" /> <m:wrapindent m:val="1440" /> <m:intlim m:val="subsup" /> <m:narylim m:val="undovr" /> </m:mathpr></w:worddocument> </xml><!
[endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* style definitions */ table.msonormaltable {mso-style-name:"table normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0in; mso-para-margin-right:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0in; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"times new roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;} </style> <![endif].
based on certain families who i've known personally in the "truth", there was infidelity which resulted in children out of wedlock, drug abuse, abortion (involving an elder's teenager), verbal, emotional, & physical abuse (by parents and spouses), and dependence on public assistance.
-
jean-luc picard
Back in the 60's , families were fine ( but then again in or out of the borg).
Today, there are more and more problems, and the so called sexual freedom.
Also, jws tend to attract people who have got disfonctions/problems etc.
If all is well with you, there would be little reason to listen to jdub talk.
So, maybe that is a reason why there are quite a few disfuntional families in the borg.
-
16
Can you be appointed as an Elder while attending college?
by doubtful inwhat is the current stance on this issue?
i've heard of a lot of ms who were going to university, and yet i've never heard of that being the case for elders.
someone on this board also mentioned recently that they knew of man who was denied appointment as an elder despite otherwise excellent qualifications because he was a college student.
-
jean-luc picard
Like your avatar: doubtful.
-
18
currently reading the da vini code, anyone read?
by highdose ini've only got to chapter five were its talking about a brain washing cult, i think... hmm sure your talking about catholics?.
is this a book worth reading anyone?.
any others you would recomend?
-
jean-luc picard
Its difficult to say if its worth reading.
Its a question of personal taste.
I read it in two days.
I even got up in the middle of the night to finish it.
-
22
New video: Is Jesus Your Mediator?
by RayPublisher inthis video is geared towards witnesses that are willing to listen to all sides:.
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xv2wcrwfcia.
-
jean-luc picard
Thanks for the link RP. I was in in 1979 but never picked up on those quotes.
.....like many others I guess.
-
10
What was a "MarkingTalk"?
by prophecor ini've only been in the truth from a distance.
family not in.
studied for years back and forth.
-
jean-luc picard
Yes, thats just about it. They dont stop talking to you, but you will not be invited to extra corricular events, no socialising, no going to their house for a meal etc. ( maybe not a bad thing actually)
You are not named. The idea is that IF someone knows its about you, then they'll mark you. If they dont know who the talk is meant for, then they go around asking lots of questions until they do . ( sorry, a bit of cynicism there. JWs dont gossip)